Dated v Brent

The Dated Brent physical has seen a strong performance, with the physical differential stable and rangebound around the 80c/bbl region. Prompt CFD rolls have rallied, with the 24-28 March 1-week roll rising to $0.35/bbl. This comes despite being in the midst of refinery maintenance season, and the strength can be attributed to robust refinery margins, which may have spurred some refineries to delay their schedules.

There is currently a divergence between sentiment in the physical and futures markets. The former has seen a strong performance with Totsa and Trafigura on the buy side of the physical. In contrast, Brent futures flat price and spreads were pressured lower following the surprise announcement by OPEC+ confirming their intention to bring back barrels in April. As a result, we expect prompt March Dated to price out strongly, while we hold a cautiously bearish view in the deferred. Reflecting this, the Bal-Mar/Apr DFL has risen from $0.15 to $0.40/bbl w/w.

This week, we have seen a good example of the dichotomy between Brent’s futures and the physical market that underpins it. In the physical, it seems that the market has found a floor this week. Equinor and Gunvor were running down the physical premium with good offering, but this has been met with better buying now. On 17 Feb, Glencore, PetroIneos, and Totsa were bidding for Forties and Midland, and we expect some better support here with good refiner buying seen with decent margins. Our view is that for this month, there is not a lot of crude left in loading cycles for the North Sea grades. This leaves Midland’s availability key to the strength of Dated. The cold weather in the US, along with fog issues at ports, could cause some issues here, from what has been some strong export levels from the States.

The re-election of President Trump has brought havoc and hysteria to oil market sentiment. Trump’s predictably unpredictable rhetoric and actions have created significant uncertainty and volatility for financial markets, which has reinforced large intraday swings in Brent futures and spreads. This filters into the Dated Brent market, where the financial meets the physical market. Physical differentials have taken a nosedive in line with weaker Brent spreads, falling to negative levels of -$0.18/bbl for the first time since early January. The herdy trading mentality of the Dated market was showcased once again, with the mighty BP, Equinor, Exxon, Gunvor, and Unipec offering a smorgasbord of cargos. Mercuria was, for the most part, alone on the buy side, taking one (many cargos) for the team.

The North Sea physical differential strengthened above $0.80/bbl last week but has since petered out, dropping to $0.69/bbl on 20 Jan. 20 Jan also saw five offers for WTI Midland in the window from Eni, Unipec, Shell and two offers from Gunvor, who interestingly was buying cargoes before this. We saw no bids in the window for the first time since 3 Jan.

The bears had their turn over the festive period, and the Dated Brent bulls have entered 2025 fully locked in. Physical differentials climbed above $0/bbl on 06 Jan, and the direction and momentum of the physical will dictate the market sentiment in the coming weeks. The theme over the Christmas period was bearish, where the physical differential was pressured below $0/bbl. We saw two trade houses and a major offer the prompt weeks, which saw the 23-27 Dec, 30-03 Jan, and 6-10 Jan crater. In addition, a significant buyer had disappeared from the bid side, which was significant. However, the new year has brought in new themes.

There was a battle for the barrels in the North Sea, with Totsa and Trafigura buying heavily and Equinor and Gunvor on the sell side. We have seen this same group of players swaying the flow in the Dated market for a few weeks now. The comparable power in the buying and selling has allowed for the Dated physical differential to move very little. The diff has been oscillating around 100c/bbl for almost a month now, failing to maintain anything 10c above or below a dollar since mid-November.

The physical Dated market remains very strong, with the physical differential remaining in triple figures for around ten days now, at 104c/bbl on 25 Nov. There has been a slight introduction of softness this week as players are pricing in the physical, which is projected to come off into December. In the window, all eyes have really been on Totsa in the past week or so as they have been supporting the physical diff with good cargo buying, potentially for placing into Chinese refineries. There seems a slight unease in the market as they expect this play to end soon and the gap between the physical support and the forward curve, which has seen some softening on expectations of this. We don’t know how much more ammunition they have here, how many more barrels they can buy before the rug is yanked from the market. Talking of Yanks, we are expecting strong US exports in the coming weeks, with Midland cargoes likely flooding the Dated market. How much of this wave Totsa is prepared to buy is another question.

There was an election across the pond last week, but it would be quite a feat of mental gymnastics to immediately connect the results with the Dated Brent market. Yet, the ramifications of Trump’s re-election may have significant implications for Atlantic Basin fundamentals, as we detail in today’s Onyx Alpha trade ideas report. Maybe not quite ‘drill baby drill’, but ongoing growth in US crude production and exports will likely weigh on the WTI/Brent spread, and further weigh on the Dated Brent physical. But in the meantime, the market continues to be topsy turvy. A US physical player has been eager to lock in this arb and fixing their paper deals ahead of time. The HTT (WTI Houston vs WTI Trade Month) has been locked in, alongside the WTI/Brent and freight. Basis risk remains, so we can expect 2025 DFLs to be sold at anytime to complete this process. Indeed, the arb of the deal. Lock in.

The Brent futures market was taut in anticipation and volatility last week as the leak of intelligence about the, at the time, looming Israeli strike on Iran meant that the waiting game would have to continue, and there were fewer clues. The front spreads have been rangebound over the fortnight, and the DFL market has superseded this, allowing for the Dated-to-Lead (DFL vs Brent spreads) structure to swing up. The question for spreads is whether they see the support from the Dated structure ripple through the DTL reverting, or whether the anticipated heavy pressure in the futures structure will strike through the structural integrity of the curve. The physical differential dropped to around 5c on 17 Oct and has gently been implied higher since.

The water has been anything but calm here in the North Sea, with the Dated Brent complex surging up into October amid a more robust futures complex and supported physical differential.

The North Sea is choppy as we enter October, and choppiness dominated the Dated Brent market this fortnight, with few signs of this ending. In the last report, the physical diff was strong above a dollar, with a Chinese bull play holding strength and bidding was seen in a few grades. 20 Sep seemed a turning point for the market with BP offering Brent, although PI lifted this. The following week (23-27 Sep) saw strong selling from the US, with Exxon offering Forties and ConocoPhillips offering Ekofisk, with Ekofisk key to setting the curve currently. This US offering helped the phys diff be implied at less than a dollar on 25 Sep and, combined with futures selling, Dated took a dive. In October, following a fairly weak expiry, there is decent strength held in the Dated complex, as PI flipped to selling the diff fell to 65c, where it has been implied steadily. The past few windows have been pretty quiet. PI has stopped its buying and US selling is quieter. The waters are choppy and not so busy.

September has been a month of many firsts in Brent futures: for one, the benchmark crude futures contract collapsed below $70/bbl on 10 Sep for the first time in three years. Soon after this feat, ICE COT data for the week ending 10 Sep reported that players were net short the Brent futures complex for the first time on record. Despite this weakness, Dated Brent and Dated differentials were shielded from the bears, with the physical differential briefly dropping to just above $0.99/bbl on 09 Sep to then rising to $1.275/bbl on 16 Sep. This relative support emerged due to strong buy-side forces present in the market. On 06 Sep, we saw Chevron offering WTI Midland across the curve, only for Totsa to lift the offer. Afterwards, we saw Gunvor and Petroineos buying Ekofisk and Midland cargoes, respectively, with BP and Glencore on the sell side.

For all the market chatter about a disappointing summer for crude oil (flat price) and refined products, Dated Brent certainly did not get the memo.

The chasm between the reality of demand sentiment and the crude oil futures markets, by extension, and the continued relentless buying in the North Sea physical seems to have been driven even wider this fortnight. Oct’24 EFP continues to price relatively weakly on partials, pointing to a squeeze in the physical rather than genuine demand. Fundamentally, margins continue to struggle with product weakness, although the lower flat price lent a touch of support.